I have been hesitant to write an article on the subject of the UN’s Wildland’s Project because it seemed too vast and too preposterous to believe. But after doing a lot of reading I am now convinced that it is real.
The Wildlands Project was the basis for the 1992 Rio De Janiero Earth Summit. The premise of the Wildlands Project is that the biodiversity of the earth is being threatened by human activities, and to protect it, huge areas of land must be returned to their natural state to allow wildlife to “recover”. That definition is an oversimplification of the full extent and scope of this UN-inspired plan.
Under the plan, approximately half of the United States would be turned into a wilderness reserve. So much of Canada would become a reserve, according to one report, that it would cease to exist as a country.
If you will simply log onto the web and type in “Wildlands Project” on the search line, you will quickly find a color-coded map of the United States. Red areas on the map are the wilderness reserve areas with corridors that connect them. These areas would be strictly off-limits for people, for any reason whatsoever. Even the airspace over these areas would be highly restricted.
The yellow areas on the map are areas that would be set aside for human habitation. These are the urban areas where populations would be concentrated and connected with a series of highways.
In the red areas, all roads, buildings and “artifacts” of human habitation would be completely removed. In the yellow areas, certain areas would be densely developed in order to concentrate human populations; other areas, such as farmlands, would be highly regulated to limit the amount of human contact the land would have.
Under this plan, for example, the regions around Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Muskogee, Lawton and a few other cities would be in the yellow areas, as well as the highways that connect them. However, towns like Boynton and Cushing would be “depopulated” and moved to urban areas. All infrastructure would be wiped off the land, it would be planted with indigenous vegetation and declared off limits to human habitation.
Now you see why I was so hesitant? This is crazy! Why would anyone allow it to happen?
The answer is that the environmentalists who have embraced the UN’s plan are very well-funded and very patient. If this is allowed to happen, it will happen over a very long period of time. They know that people will feel very threatened by the plan, and that it will have to be done slowly and without their knowledge.
For example, creating economic conditions that cause people to move from small towns to jobs in urban areas could cause the population of smaller towns to decline, creating an opportunity for environmentalists and/or the government to buy out large areas of sparsely populated land. (I wrote about the tactic of “Rural Cleansing” in the August 18, 2005 issue of the Tulsa Beacon).
In 1993, Bill Clinton signed the Biodiversity Treaty (from the 1992 Rio De Janeiro Earth Summit), and in 1994 the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved its ratification by Congress. Al Gore went into high gear to insure its passage.
The fact that the treaty would implement the Wildlands Project was concealed from Congress, but it was proven by a document called the Global Biodiversity Assessment. The Chicago Tribune, the Washington Post, the UN, and the Clinton White House claimed that this document did not exist, but the day that the newspaper articles were published, the document was delivered to legislators. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) presented the evidence to the Senate, and the vote for the treaty was called off.
Clinton decided that if the Congress would not pass it, he would simply implement the principles of the treaty into his own policy by issuing an executive order.
Hence it is not difficult to understand why there is so much resistance to developing new sources of oil on federal lands, as well as the other environmental movements to remove dams, farms, roads and other developments. Environmentalists have begun organizations like ROAD RIP, which stands for the “Road Removal Implementation Project”, whose director was quoted to have said, “As simple as it may seem, if we can stop roads now, then we have a lot less timber sales, mines and motorized recreation to stop later.”
As I often say in my articles, don’t take my word for it, take responsibility as a citizen and study this critical freedom and property rights issue for yourself. This movement is so large and convoluted that I can’t possibly cover it adequately in my article. But I can say that if you do not do something to protect those rights, it may someday be your house that gets bulldozed away.