Home
Projects

Architectural Services

Master Planning
Articles by R.W. Bright
Pre-drawn Plans
Staff
 

Green Roofs Not All They’re Said to Be

For those of you who read my column, you know that my opinion of the “green” movement is that it has its good aspects and not-so-good aspects. When an idea comes out of the green movement, it needs to be scrutinized to see if it is really a worthy idea. Such is the case of “green roofing”.

Green roofing is done by installing soil on top of a roof in order to growing vegetation. It has been done for many years in countries like Germany, where in its cities high density development leaves little room for vegetation. It has been estimated that about ten percent of Germany’s roofs are now green, and that almost 350 million square feet of green roofs were installed between 1989 and 1999. The city of Tokyo now requires all new construction to include green roofing.

The reasons that the environmental movement gives for green roofing are numerous, and most of them have merit.

If done well, it can be very aesthetically pleasing to see a roof covered with vegetation instead of an ugly roof covering. This is especially true for those who live or work in high rises and look down out of their windows at the roofs below.

Vegetation will reduce the heat island effect that occurs when roofing absorbs heat from sunlight. The combination of paving and roofing can significantly raise the ambient air temperature around buildings, creating a greater heat load for air conditioning systems to overcome. The heat island effect creates the need for larger systems and causes the systems to work harder, thereby using more energy. Vegetation will not absorb the amount of energy that a roof will, so it reduces these loads.

The soil on a green roof is a good insulator, so it reduces the heating and air conditioning needs of the building. Because of its mass, temperatures of the soil remain more stable, and this reduces the temperature swings in the building.

More vegetation reduces the amount of carbon dioxide and increases the amount of oxygen.

The soil will remove nitrogen from rainwater when the vegetation absorbs nitrogen from the soil, effectively filtering the nitrogen out before the water drains away.

Environmentalists claim that the soil has the ability to neutralize acid rain as it filters through the soil.

Vegetation has the ability to absorb noise, which will reduce the amount of noise that traffic produces.

It will also reduce the amount of stormwater runoff by absorbing the rainwater. If you have done any construction here in Tulsa, you know that stormwater management is a big deal, as it is in many other parts of the country. Impervious surfaces like roofing will cause a great deal more rainwater to be diverted into our drainage systems.

Finally, the vegetation creates a habitat for birds.

All of this sounds great, and it is all pretty much true. But you should look at the practical aspects of this system before ever considering it. Here are some things you should.

Soil is heavy, especially when it is saturated with rainwater. This means that the roof structure must be designed to carry the additional weight. You should not plan to hang a suspended ceiling from the roof structure because it can move up and down as the weight decreases and increases with the weight of the water. The flexing of the roof can cause ceiling panels to fall out and cause damage to the roofing membrane. The only way to overcome this problem is to over-design the roof so it won’t move at all, which is not economical.

The roof drainage system should also be increased in size, and should be designed so that there are no tight turns in the drain lines, otherwise soil that washes into the system will eventually clog it. In addition, the roofing system must be extremely well-designed and expertly installed, because finding leaks and making repairs will require excavation.

The vegetation requires a lot more maintenance than a standard roof. Many green roofs are nothing more than grass, but even that must be watered, fertilized and mowed. It seems strange to me that a movement that is against watering and fertilizing lawns and doesn’t like using electric or gasoline mowers would want to create a situation where there would be more of it than less.

All of this is not to say that I am opposed to green roofing. However, anyone considering this system should be willing to balance and accept the additional costs and risks that come with it.


 

 

   
8-1-2005    ©2006 Randy W. Bright, AIA, NCARB, Church Architect
4821 So. Sheridan Suite 209 • Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145 • Phone No. 918-664-7957 • Fax No. 918-622-0097• Email